• Student SHREYA KHURANA
  • Code PUP21336
  • Faculty Planning
  • Tutor/s Rutul Joshi,Umesh Shurpali,Ravi Sannabhadti,Anil kumar Roy,Nitika Bhakuni,Vanishree Herlekar,Narendra Mangwani,Rujul Dipak joshi,Arjun Joshi,Tarun Patel,Rushil Palavajjhala
  • TA Jacob Baby,Navnit Sourirajan,Giby Abraham,Shreesha Arondekar,Amrutha Balan,Gunjan Jangid,Mallika Sehgal,Sreedevi Kurur,Swashya Suresh,Tamanna Parvin,Aishwarya Shekar

397
views

The history of Ahmedabad suggests a preferential choice of the mill owners settling in Shahibaug. Over the years, Shahibaug has attracted the wealthiest. Even after an unceasing demand, it continues to be a low-density affluent residential neighborhood under the regressive planning mechanism adopted by a single landowner. A study of one square kilometer of the residential neighborhood of Shahibaug suggests how such a regressive mechanism leads to inaccessibility to public spaces, locked-up land, and restricted dynamism. Such affluent neighborhoods fail to address the needs of the lower-income class.